Friday, August 6, 2010

V semester Industrial Psychology notes

    Appraising Performance
   Performance
      “what is actually done on a j.o.b”
   Effectiveness
      Evaluation of result of performance
   “Performance Appraisal is the periodic, formal evaluation of employee performance for the purpose of making career decisions.
    Biases in Appraisal 
    • Racial /Regional Biases & Discriminations
    •     : subjective human judgments
    • Age Biases : old vs. young?
    • Non-uniform Criteria for Compliance
    • Halo Effect : to judge all attributes of person based on a single attribute .
    Need for Performance Appraisals……. 
    1. Provide Systematic judgments for salary hikes,transfers,demotions or terminations
    2. Feedback Mechanisms:telling subordinate ‘how’ effective is their performance
    3. Base for coaching & counselling and further training.
    Where are Performance Appraisals Needed: 
   ADMINISTRATION : pay & promotions
   RESEARCH :
    1. Validating Selection Instruments
   2. Assessing Training Requirements
   Employee Improvement- feedback
   Personnel Decisions : wage/transfer etc.
    Methods of PerformanceAppraisal   
   Objective Production Data
   Personnel data
   Judgmental Data
Employee Comparison Methods 
Objective Production 
Computerised Performance Monitoring 
    • Assessed in terms of tangibles produced created :e.g..Assembly line, sales,volumes.
    • Variability in performance may be due to performance conditions
    • Do not tell whole story – quality of product  etc not measured.

 
    • Unit of work : keystroke,errors etc stored elecronically
    • Telecommunications,Airline,Hotel Telephone operators etc.
    • Stressful : Observed all the time . –continuous Monitoring.
    • Advantage: Objective, immediate Feedback
    • Reduced Rater Bias
Judgmental data
 
Paired Comparison Approach  
    • More widely used because objective measures fail where unit of work not quantifuable e.g.. Documentary film maker.
    • Subjective assessments
    • Supervisors –Peers-Self :
    • Accord Ranks on Objective Scales  -360degree

 
    • Between two workers. N(N-1)/2
    + Same rank to those of equal ability
    +Judgment simpler
    • -Increases no. of Comparisons
    • - Restricted to Small workforce
    • or Single ranking of job effectiveness
Appraisal Techniques 
Types of Judgment Methods 
Advantages vs. Disadvantages 
   Judgmental Methods
      BARS : Behavioral Rating Scales
360 degree appraisals.
      Paired Comparison Method :
N(N-1)/2
      Behavioral Observation Scales :
critical incidents
      Management by Objectives MBO: mutually agreed upon goals 

    • BARS/BOS techniques rely heavily on observational skills of supervisor
    • May be biased
    • Identification of critical incidents which define performance be incomplete
    • Frequency of critical incident performances assessed –total is summation of all.
Management by Objectives [MBO]
 
Goals/Period –Mutually agreed upon ‘Objectives’ 
Focus  is on ‘Results’ not on traits or abilities on wht is done’…






 

Two Phases  

 

Advantages Disadvantages:
 

+ Increase Employee Motivation & Productivity  because  self Set Goals 
--  May set far reaching – unattainable goals non-realistic 
 


   Goal setting
      Mutually decide goals
      Given Period 6months/quarter/Annual
      Important to have Realistic Goals
   Performance Review
      Extent to which goals met assessed  mutually
      Result based not trait based assessment.
Performance Appraisal For Managers 
    • Objective Techniques more for Blue  Collar Workers
    • Managers white collar workers performance cannot be quantified > subjective
 
    • Assessment Centres
    • Evaluation by Superiors
    • Peer Rating
    • Self Evaluation Self Ratings
    • Evaluation by Subordinnated [juniors]

No comments:

Post a Comment